Class Dismissed

April 13, 2022 - False Advertising, FDA, Product Liability, Consumer Products, Retail
Rulings, FDA Guidance May Help Food Cos. In Protein Suits
By: Claudia M. Vetesi and Lena Gankin
Originally published by Law360 , Claudia Vetesi, Nicole Ozeran, and Lena Gankin authored an article discussing a wave of protein-labeling lawsuits hitting food manufacturers, alleging that their products’ front-label protein content statements violate U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, and mislead consumers by overstating the amount
... ›
July 20, 2021 - False Advertising, Announcements & Press, Food Misbranding, Product Liability, Consumer Products, Class Action, Retail
Morrison & Foerster Achieves Top Ranking in Advertising and Marketing Litigation
Legal 500 US 2021 recognized Morrison & Foerster as a top firm in Advertising and Marketing Litigation. See what our clients and peers are saying about MoFo’s Class Actions + Mass Torts Group.
... ›
July 16, 2021 - False Advertising, FDA, Food Misbranding, Consumer Products
Manuka Honey and Waterslides
By: James R. Sigel
This week, we take a look at a decision addressing what a “reasonable” consumer will know in purchasing a product (and distinguishing the Seventh Circuit in the process), and at another assessing the legality of Washington’s pandemic-related shutdown of a waterpark. MOORE v. TRADER
... ›
September 15, 2020 - False Advertising, NAD, Consumer Products, FTC, Class Action
Advertising Checklist for In-House Counsel
By: Penelope A. Preovolos and Claudia M. Vetesi
Along with making their advertising materials eye-catching and influential, consumer‑facing companies need to ensure that their representations about products and services comply with advertising laws. This article discusses basic advertising law, some things to avoid and some things to do. Although every state has
... ›
August 19, 2020 - False Advertising, Class Action
Fool Me Once, No Injunctive Relief on Behalf of a Class of Purchasers
By: Matthew E. Ladew
Does a plaintiff who files a class action alleging false advertising have Article III standing to seek injunctive relief—even when that plaintiff is a past purchaser of the product, and therefore is aware of the defendant’s allegedly false statements regarding the product? The Ninth
... ›
July 01, 2020 - False Advertising, Consumer Products, Class Action
Ninth Circuit Holds Plaintiffs Not Entitled To Equitable Restitution Under UCL/CLRA If Adequate Remedy At Law Is Available
Earlier this month, the Ninth Circuit held that state law cannot expand or confine a federal court’s power to issue equitable restitution because federal courts are bound by traditional equitable principles, which require, among other things, a showing of an inadequate remedy at law.
... ›
May 01, 2020 - False Advertising, Appellate & Supreme Court
California Supreme Court: Civil Penalty Claims Brought by Government Under UCL and FAL Should Be Determined by Court—Not Jury
By: Claudia M. Vetesi
The California Supreme Court has confirmed that claims for civil penalties brought by government entities under California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”)[1] and False Advertising Law (“FAL”)[2] should be decided by a judge—not a jury. See Nationwide Biweekly Administration Inc. et al. v. Superior Court
... ›
February 26, 2020 - False Advertising, Food Misbranding, MDL, Consumer Products
Is the Coke Half Full or Half Empty?
By: Claudia M. Vetesi
Earlier this month, a California federal judge certified six classes asserting state consumer protection statute claims in a multidistrict litigation alleging that The Coca-Cola Co. misled consumers about artificial flavors and added preservatives in its Coke products. See In re: Coca‑Cola Products Marketing and
... ›
June 06, 2019 - False Advertising, Food Misbranding, Consumer Products
“Natural” Complaint Barks Up the Wrong Tree
By: Claudia M. Vetesi
A New York federal court recently dismissed a putative class action alleging that a line of dog food products was improperly labeled as “natural” where the plaintiff alleged that the products contained only trace amounts of glyphosate, an herbicide. See Parks v. Ainsworth Pet
... ›
May 16, 2019 - False Advertising, Class Certification, Food Misbranding, Consumer Products, Class Action
Lead Plaintiff Spreads Her Misleading Butter Case a Little Too Thin
By: Claudia M. Vetesi
In April, a New York federal court denied certification for a purported class alleging that Johnson & Johnson misled customers by placing the words “no trans fat” on labels for its Benecol buttery spreads. See Bowling v. Johnson & Johnson, et al. , 1:17-cv-03892,
... ›