Class Dismissed

November 19, 2018 - Appellate & Supreme Court, TCPA
U.S. Supreme Court to Review Deference to the FCC in TCPA Cases
By: Tiffany Cheung
Does the Hobbs Act require district courts to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act? That is the question the United States Supreme Court will consider in PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc. , Docket
... ›
October 15, 2018 - Appellate & Supreme Court, Environmental Law, Product Liability, Consumer Products
BREAKING: Appellate Court Halts Trial on Coffee
By: James M. Schurz
On Friday, October 12, 2018, California’s Second Appellate District Court stayed the trial that was set to begin on Monday, October 15, 2018, in Los Angeles Superior Court, regarding whether cancer warnings are required for sales of coffee in California. The trial in Council
... ›
May 17, 2018 - False Advertising, Appellate & Supreme Court, Consumer Products, Retail
Update: Ninth Circuit Softens Its Decision In Flushable Wipes Case
On May 9, 2018, the Ninth Circuit issued an Opinion amending its previous decision in Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. , 873 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2017). As we noted in our December 4, 2017 post on the 2017 decision, the Ninth Circuit had held
... ›
March 16, 2018 - Appellate & Supreme Court, Drug & Medical Device, Product Liability
Will High Court Provide Clarity On ‘Clear Evidence’?
By: Erin M. Bosman and Julie Y. Park
The U.S. Supreme Court may soon revisit one of its seminal decisions defining products liability law for pharmaceutical manufacturers. That decision — Wyeth v. Levine — addressed whether a branded manufacturer could be held liable for state-law failure-to-warn claims even though federal law regulates
... ›
February 23, 2018 - False Advertising, Appellate & Supreme Court, Food Misbranding
Second Time Is Not the Charm: Judge Koh Slams Plaintiff’s Second Bid for Class Certification in Baby Food Case
On remand from the Ninth Circuit, Judge Koh nixed a plaintiff’s second attempt to certify a nationwide class of Gerber’s baby food purchasers. Her decision is notable for two reasons. First, in denying plaintiff’s Rule 23(b)(2) injunctive relief class based on changes to Gerber’s
... ›
December 26, 2017 - Appellate & Supreme Court, Product Liability, Consumer Products, Class Action, Retail
California Appellate Court Upholds Denial of Class Certification on Ascertainability Grounds
On December 4, 2017, a panel of the California Court of Appeal unanimously affirmed a trial court’s denial of class certification for alleged violations of California’s unfair competition, consumer protection, and false advertising laws. In so doing, the court upheld the lower court’s conclusions
... ›
July 11, 2017 - Appellate & Supreme Court, FDA, Drug & Medical Device, Product Liability, Consumer Products
FDA’s Denial of Citizen’s Petition “Clear” Enough for Preemption of Failure-to-Warn Claims
By: Erin M. Bosman and Julie Y. Park
The Tenth Circuit recently upheld a Utah district court’s finding that a branded drug manufacturer could not be held liable for failing to warn consumers about alleged birth defect risks when the FDA had previously rejected a citizen’s petition calling for the same warnings.
... ›
June 23, 2017 - Appellate & Supreme Court, Drug & Medical Device, Product Liability, Consumer Products, Class Action
Supreme Court Says “No” to “Litigation Tourism”
There has been a lot said already about the effect on product liability (especially drug) cases and “mass actions” as a result of the United States Supreme Court’s June 17, 2017 decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California , No. 16-466.
... ›
June 13, 2017 - Appellate & Supreme Court, Product Liability, Consumer Products, Class Action
Supreme Court Slams the Back Door Around Rule 23(f) in Microsoft v. Baker
By: Claudia M. Vetesi
Introduction. Yesterday, on June 12, 2017, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Microsoft Corp. v. Baker et al. , a closely watched case in the class action world, and one on which we previously reported here. Baker presented the following question: Can a
... ›
March 24, 2017 - False Advertising, Appellate & Supreme Court, Food Misbranding, Product Liability
Judge Koh Issues First Blow to “Added Sugars” Plaintiffs
By: Claudia M. Vetesi
The Big Picture: On Tuesday, Judge Koh granted Kellogg’s Motion to Dismiss in its entirety in Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Company , No. 5:16-cv-04955-LHK (N.D. Cal.). Hadley is one of three cases [1] against well-known cereal makers pending in the Northern District of California.
... ›